الزعيم
مشرف سابق
وظيفة مستشار Consultant:WCH-Shababik Gaza Evaluation - مؤسسة أطفال الحرب هولندا War Child Holland - غزة
War Child Holland ـ Consultant:WCH-Shababik Gaza Evaluation - Terms of Reference Final Evaluation
Background
War Child Holland (WCH) is an independent and impartial international non-governmental child rights organization investing in a peaceful future for children and young people affected by armed conflict. We strive to empower children and young people while enabling adults to bring about positive and lasting change in the lives of conflict affected children and young people.
WCH has been working in the occupied Palestinian territories since 2004 through local partner organizations and currently has a portfolio of 10 partners in the oPt.
WCH started a partnership with Shababik in 2010 in Gaza through the implementation of 1-year cycle projects to raise awareness on Child Rights in the Gaza Strip using various forms of art as a means.
Names of projects being evaluated:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012)
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013)
Implementing agency and partner(s): Shababik/GUCC (General Union for Cultural Centers)
Projects duration and period evaluated:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012), August – December 2012
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013), May – October 2013
Projects budget:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012), 70,928 NIS
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013), 99,184 NIS
Type of evaluation: Final
Project funding sources: WCH
Main projects objective and outputs:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012)
Main project objective: To strengthen children’s skills to advocate for their rights in their communities using arts as a means.
Project Outputs:
-100 children in Gaza have received training in child rights and have the ability to express the key child rights issues affecting their lives through arts.
-The Palestinian Community in Gaza, including the children’s families and peers are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013)
Main projects objective: To strengthen children’s skills to advocate for their rights in their communities using arts as a means.
Project Outputs:
-100 children in Gaza have received training in child rights and have the ability to express the key child rights issues affecting their lives through arts.
-Palestinian community in all Palestinian territories, GS, WB, and Jerusalem are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
-Children’s families and peers are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
Purpose
To assess the overall impact, efficiency and effectiveness of the projects in terms of:
-Results achieved
-Impact of the project on the target group and how it will be sustained
-Record and share lessons that will assist in improving WCH/Shababik support to communities
-lessons learnt to inform future work of Shababik and WCH
-Enable evidence-based decision making
-Assess whether the partnership/projects still fit in the new Global Strategy of WCH.
WCH will use the findings and lessons learnt of the evaluation to inform our future programmatic plans and Country Strategy in the occupied Palestinian territory and globally.
Specific Objectives
1-Relevance and Impact - To identify if the project is making a difference for the target population as per the stated objective(s), including:
-If the project’s overall goals and results are currently relevant to the needs and priorities of children and youth and community – including the most vulnerable population - as identified by the beneficiaries themselves.
-If the project’s activities have had an impact : positive and negative changes produced by an intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended - on the targeted beneficiaries and what the impact has been;
-If the projects’ activities have had an impact on the targeted beneficiaries’ families/communities and what the impact has been;
-If the partners’ project is in line with WCH country strategy and WCH global outcome indicators.
-Is there evidence that the project made a difference to the target group(s)? Include quotes from direct and indirect target beneficiaries and label them accordingly.
2-Effectiveness - to assess and make recommendations on the overall effectiveness of the project, including:
-the extent to which the results of the project have been achieved [with reference to the agreed outcome indicators and other relevant information];
-the extent to which the methodology used is effective in achieving results;
-the progress made in the achievement of results throughout the funding period;
-evidence based analysis of factors and activities leading to successful project results;
-evidence based analysis of factors and activities constraining successful project results;
-Any unexpected outcomes or consequences of activities (positive or harmful).
-Current Monitoring (and quality control) processes in operation
3-Efficiency - to assess if the project has made an efficient use of resources in terms of money, staff, time and number of beneficiaries reached.
4-Partnership – to assess whether and to which extent the partnership with War Child Holland has contributed to the results, including assessing all aspects related to capacity building, the role of WCH .
5-Innovation – to assess and make recommendations on the innovative aspects of the partnership/projects, including recommendations on how it can be replicated.
6-Sustainability – to assess and make recommendations on the sustainability of the project, including:
-What aspects of the project will continue if funding ends?
-How will these aspects be funded and by whom (e.g., national/local government or other organization)?
-What aspects of the project will stop and what impact will this have?
-What aspects of the project are replicable elsewhere?
-What were the major factors which influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the project?
Evaluation Team
The evaluation will be conducted by one external consultant accompanied by a War Child staff when needed.
Outputs
-Planned methods (including tools) and schedule presented to WCH for input before commencing data collection; in depth consultation meetings with WCH on methods and relevant questions before commencing data collection;
-In depth consultations with beneficiaries of the projects;
-Preliminary findings debrief workshop held with relevant WCH and partner organization
-Evaluation report
-A draft of the evaluation report submitted to WCH for input within 2 weeks of completing the field work.
-A short summary of findings and recommendations in English within 3 weeks of completing the field work.
-A final evaluation report, including documentation of timeline, methodology; analysis, final recommendations within 4 weeks of completing the field work. The final evaluation report should be signed by the consultant and submitted in soft copy in English.
-Documented evaluation method that can be replicated (with minimal adjustments) in other War Child countries.
Time frame
The evaluation is expected to take a maximum of 12 working days:
-Preparation, design of the evaluation, document analysis and consultations with WCH staff - 4 days (Gaza based)
-Field work including meeting with partner and partner’s beneficiaries, observation of activities, etc.- 3 days (Gaza based)
-Write up first draft report – 2 days (remote or Gaza based)
-Presentation of the preliminary findings and collection of feedback - 1 day (Jerusalem or Gaza based)
-Write up final report incorporating changes after feedback - 2 days (remote or Gaza based)
The starting date of the consultancy is Monday, October 14.
Methodology
The consultant will employ both quantitative and qualitative methods in data collection and analysis taking the perspectives of different stakeholders; in particular the views of children and youth should be taken into serious consideration. Methods used should be participatory and sensitive to the group that the project focuses on. A reasonable sample of project participants and stakeholders should be surveyed, as well as all key Shababik and WCH project staff. WCH will provide relevant project documents / reports, office working space and make necessary appointments for meetings with respondents.
Profile required
Essential
-Relevant academic qualifications and field experience;
-Highly proficient in written and spoken English as well Arabic;
-Extensive experience in designing and implementation of assessments and evaluations;
-Understanding of issues and sensitivities required when working with children and youth in politically challenged contexts;
-Research skills and commitment to participatory research methodologies;
-Objectivity, and ability to operate systematically with minimal supervision;
-Result oriented and committed to respect deadlines.
-Able to access and work in Gaza.
Preferable
-Experience in evaluating child rights, child protection and advocacy interventions;
-Background knowledge of the historical and political situation in the Middle East, and Gaza in particular.
Submission of proposals:
To apply please provide:
-A proposal (500 words maximum) detailing how you will respond to the assignment, including (1) data collection; (2) analysis of findings; (3) dissemination;
-CV;
-Daily rate for the consultancy. This rate will include all costs incurred for this consultancy (taxes, travel, insurance, etc).
Deadline for proposals is Monday, 30 September 2013 and be submitted by email to:
info.opt@warchild.nl
Please state reference ‘WCH-Shababik Gaza Evaluation’ in subject line.
The proposal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
-The consultant’s/organization’s experience and capacity in carrying out evaluations
-The approach in responding to the ToR
-Competitiveness from a financial perspective
Final remuneration for the evaluation will be issued upon delivery of a final report that is satisfactory to both parties.
War Child Holland ـ Consultant:WCH-Shababik Gaza Evaluation - Terms of Reference Final Evaluation
Background
War Child Holland (WCH) is an independent and impartial international non-governmental child rights organization investing in a peaceful future for children and young people affected by armed conflict. We strive to empower children and young people while enabling adults to bring about positive and lasting change in the lives of conflict affected children and young people.
WCH has been working in the occupied Palestinian territories since 2004 through local partner organizations and currently has a portfolio of 10 partners in the oPt.
WCH started a partnership with Shababik in 2010 in Gaza through the implementation of 1-year cycle projects to raise awareness on Child Rights in the Gaza Strip using various forms of art as a means.
Names of projects being evaluated:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012)
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013)
Implementing agency and partner(s): Shababik/GUCC (General Union for Cultural Centers)
Projects duration and period evaluated:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012), August – December 2012
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013), May – October 2013
Projects budget:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012), 70,928 NIS
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013), 99,184 NIS
Type of evaluation: Final
Project funding sources: WCH
Main projects objective and outputs:
1-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2012)
Main project objective: To strengthen children’s skills to advocate for their rights in their communities using arts as a means.
Project Outputs:
-100 children in Gaza have received training in child rights and have the ability to express the key child rights issues affecting their lives through arts.
-The Palestinian Community in Gaza, including the children’s families and peers are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
2-Child led awareness raising on children’s rights (2013)
Main projects objective: To strengthen children’s skills to advocate for their rights in their communities using arts as a means.
Project Outputs:
-100 children in Gaza have received training in child rights and have the ability to express the key child rights issues affecting their lives through arts.
-Palestinian community in all Palestinian territories, GS, WB, and Jerusalem are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
-Children’s families and peers are aware about child rights and the main child rights violations in Gaza.
Purpose
To assess the overall impact, efficiency and effectiveness of the projects in terms of:
-Results achieved
-Impact of the project on the target group and how it will be sustained
-Record and share lessons that will assist in improving WCH/Shababik support to communities
-lessons learnt to inform future work of Shababik and WCH
-Enable evidence-based decision making
-Assess whether the partnership/projects still fit in the new Global Strategy of WCH.
WCH will use the findings and lessons learnt of the evaluation to inform our future programmatic plans and Country Strategy in the occupied Palestinian territory and globally.
Specific Objectives
1-Relevance and Impact - To identify if the project is making a difference for the target population as per the stated objective(s), including:
-If the project’s overall goals and results are currently relevant to the needs and priorities of children and youth and community – including the most vulnerable population - as identified by the beneficiaries themselves.
-If the project’s activities have had an impact : positive and negative changes produced by an intervention, directly or indirectly, intended or unintended - on the targeted beneficiaries and what the impact has been;
-If the projects’ activities have had an impact on the targeted beneficiaries’ families/communities and what the impact has been;
-If the partners’ project is in line with WCH country strategy and WCH global outcome indicators.
-Is there evidence that the project made a difference to the target group(s)? Include quotes from direct and indirect target beneficiaries and label them accordingly.
2-Effectiveness - to assess and make recommendations on the overall effectiveness of the project, including:
-the extent to which the results of the project have been achieved [with reference to the agreed outcome indicators and other relevant information];
-the extent to which the methodology used is effective in achieving results;
-the progress made in the achievement of results throughout the funding period;
-evidence based analysis of factors and activities leading to successful project results;
-evidence based analysis of factors and activities constraining successful project results;
-Any unexpected outcomes or consequences of activities (positive or harmful).
-Current Monitoring (and quality control) processes in operation
3-Efficiency - to assess if the project has made an efficient use of resources in terms of money, staff, time and number of beneficiaries reached.
4-Partnership – to assess whether and to which extent the partnership with War Child Holland has contributed to the results, including assessing all aspects related to capacity building, the role of WCH .
5-Innovation – to assess and make recommendations on the innovative aspects of the partnership/projects, including recommendations on how it can be replicated.
6-Sustainability – to assess and make recommendations on the sustainability of the project, including:
-What aspects of the project will continue if funding ends?
-How will these aspects be funded and by whom (e.g., national/local government or other organization)?
-What aspects of the project will stop and what impact will this have?
-What aspects of the project are replicable elsewhere?
-What were the major factors which influenced the achievement or non-achievement of sustainability of the project?
Evaluation Team
The evaluation will be conducted by one external consultant accompanied by a War Child staff when needed.
Outputs
-Planned methods (including tools) and schedule presented to WCH for input before commencing data collection; in depth consultation meetings with WCH on methods and relevant questions before commencing data collection;
-In depth consultations with beneficiaries of the projects;
-Preliminary findings debrief workshop held with relevant WCH and partner organization
-Evaluation report
-A draft of the evaluation report submitted to WCH for input within 2 weeks of completing the field work.
-A short summary of findings and recommendations in English within 3 weeks of completing the field work.
-A final evaluation report, including documentation of timeline, methodology; analysis, final recommendations within 4 weeks of completing the field work. The final evaluation report should be signed by the consultant and submitted in soft copy in English.
-Documented evaluation method that can be replicated (with minimal adjustments) in other War Child countries.
Time frame
The evaluation is expected to take a maximum of 12 working days:
-Preparation, design of the evaluation, document analysis and consultations with WCH staff - 4 days (Gaza based)
-Field work including meeting with partner and partner’s beneficiaries, observation of activities, etc.- 3 days (Gaza based)
-Write up first draft report – 2 days (remote or Gaza based)
-Presentation of the preliminary findings and collection of feedback - 1 day (Jerusalem or Gaza based)
-Write up final report incorporating changes after feedback - 2 days (remote or Gaza based)
The starting date of the consultancy is Monday, October 14.
Methodology
The consultant will employ both quantitative and qualitative methods in data collection and analysis taking the perspectives of different stakeholders; in particular the views of children and youth should be taken into serious consideration. Methods used should be participatory and sensitive to the group that the project focuses on. A reasonable sample of project participants and stakeholders should be surveyed, as well as all key Shababik and WCH project staff. WCH will provide relevant project documents / reports, office working space and make necessary appointments for meetings with respondents.
Profile required
Essential
-Relevant academic qualifications and field experience;
-Highly proficient in written and spoken English as well Arabic;
-Extensive experience in designing and implementation of assessments and evaluations;
-Understanding of issues and sensitivities required when working with children and youth in politically challenged contexts;
-Research skills and commitment to participatory research methodologies;
-Objectivity, and ability to operate systematically with minimal supervision;
-Result oriented and committed to respect deadlines.
-Able to access and work in Gaza.
Preferable
-Experience in evaluating child rights, child protection and advocacy interventions;
-Background knowledge of the historical and political situation in the Middle East, and Gaza in particular.
Submission of proposals:
To apply please provide:
-A proposal (500 words maximum) detailing how you will respond to the assignment, including (1) data collection; (2) analysis of findings; (3) dissemination;
-CV;
-Daily rate for the consultancy. This rate will include all costs incurred for this consultancy (taxes, travel, insurance, etc).
Deadline for proposals is Monday, 30 September 2013 and be submitted by email to:
info.opt@warchild.nl
Please state reference ‘WCH-Shababik Gaza Evaluation’ in subject line.
The proposal will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
-The consultant’s/organization’s experience and capacity in carrying out evaluations
-The approach in responding to the ToR
-Competitiveness from a financial perspective
Final remuneration for the evaluation will be issued upon delivery of a final report that is satisfactory to both parties.